Biological and glucocorticoids treatment impair the medium-term immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the sustained immunological response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) undergoing different treatment regimens. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study involving 157 AIRD patients without prior COVID-19 infection. Treatment regimens included non-treatment or glucocorticoid-only (not-treated/GCs), non-biological drugs, biological therapy, and JAK inhibitors. All participants completed the two-dose vaccine schedule, and 110 of them received an additional booster dose. Serum samples were collected approximately 3-6 months after the second and third vaccine doses to measure antibodies against the Spike protein (antiS-AB) and neutralizing antibodies (nAB) targeting six SARS-CoV-2 variants. RESULTS: Following the third dose, all patients exhibited a significant increase in antiS-AB (FC = 15, p < 0.0001). Patients under biological therapy had lower titres compared to the non-biological (66% decrease, p = 0.038) and the not-treated/GCs group (62% decrease, p = 0.0132), with the latter persisting after the booster dose (86% decrease, p = 0.0027). GC use was associated with lower antiS-AB levels in the biological group (87% decrease, p = 0.0124), although not statistically significant after confounders adjustment. nABs showed the highest positivity rates for the wild-type strain before (50%) and after the booster dose (93%), while the Omicron variant exhibited the lowest rates (11% and 55%, respectively). All variants demonstrated similar positivity patterns and good concordance with antiS-AB (AUCs from 0.896 to 0.997). CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster strategy effectively elicited a sustained antibody immune response in AIRD patients. However, patients under biological therapies exhibited a reduced response to the booster dose, particularly when combined with GCs.

Specific-cytokine associations with outcomes in knee osteoarthritis subgroups: breaking down disease heterogeneity with phenotyping.

BACKGROUND: Despite existing extensive literature, a comprehensive and clinically relevant classification system for osteoarthritis (OA) has yet to be established. In this study, we aimed to further characterize four knee OA (KOA) inflammatory phenotypes (KOIP) recently proposed by our group, by identifying the inflammatory factors associated with KOA severity and progression in a phenotype-specific manner. METHODS: We performed an analysis within each of the previously defined four KOIP groups, to assess the association between KOA severity and progression and a panel of 13 cytokines evaluated in the plasma and synovial fluid of our cohort's patients. The cohort included 168 symptomatic female KOA patients with persistent joint effusion. RESULTS: Overall, our analyses showed that associations with KOA outcomes were of higher magnitude within the KOIP groups than for the overall patient series (all p-values < 1.30e-16) and that several of the cytokines showed a KOIP-specific behaviour regarding their associations with KOA outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study adds further evidence supporting KOA as a multifaceted syndrome composed of multiple phenotypes with differing pathophysiological pathways, providing an explanation for inconsistencies between previous studies focussed on the role of cytokines in OA and the lack of translational results to date. Our findings also highlight the potential clinical benefits of accurately phenotyping KOA patients, including improved patient stratification, tailored therapies, and the discovery of novel treatments.

Sex differential impact of comorbidities in spondyloarthritis: data from COMOSPA study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the prevalence of comorbidities in female and male patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to assess whether comorbidities had a different impact on disease outcomes in male and female patients. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis study. Differences in comorbidities regarding sex were assessed using logistic regression models. Comorbidities were evaluated for their impact on disease outcomes (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, European health-related quality of life questionnaire) with linear models, which included sex and comorbidity as explanatory variables and their interaction. Age and treatment with biological synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were included as confounders. RESULTS: We included 3982 patients with SpA (65% male, mean age 43.6 years). Male and female patients with SpA exhibited similar comorbidity profiles, except for a low prevalence of fibromyalgia in males and a higher prevalence of certain cardiovascular risk factors in males (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment and ischaemic heart disease). Comorbidities, especially fibromyalgia, correlated with higher disease activity, decreased physical function and reduced health-related quality of life in both sexes. Some comorbidities exhibited sex-specific associations with disease outcomes. Peptic ulcers and high waist circumference had a greater impact on disease activity in females (with a higher impact in BASDAI than in ASDAS). In contrast, osteoporosis had a more pronounced effect on physical function in male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities exert distinct influences on disease activity, physical function and health-related quality of life in male and female patients with SpA. Understanding these sex-specific effects is crucial for improving SpA management, emphasising the importance of assessing disease activity using ASDAS when comorbidities are present to mitigate sex-related disparities in disease assessment.

Corrigendum: The paradigm of IL-23-independent production of IL-17F and IL-17A and their role in chronic inflammatory diseases.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191782.].

Implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and improve the level of implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Qualitative study. We performed a narrative literature review to identify the recommendations for the psychological management of SpA and associated IBD and to explore their level of implementation. Based on the findings, we developed a national survey to assess: (1) current level of knowledge and implementation of the recommendations; (2) attitudes towards the recommendations; and (3) barriers and facilitators to their implementation. The results of the review and survey were discussed by a multidisciplinary group of 9 expert rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, who defined implementation strategies to increase the uptake of the recommendations. RESULTS: The review included 4 articles, 2 of them included direct recommendations on the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with SpA and IBD. None assessed the level of implementation of the recommendations in routine clinical practice. Our survey showed a great lack of awareness and implementation of the recommendations, even though psychological issues are very relevant for health professionals. Lack of time, resources, and knowledge are considered the main barriers to adherence to the recommendations. We propose several implementation strategies related to educational activities, clinical practice, and others to increase the uptake of reported recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Further research and efforts are required to achieve behaviour changes in clinical practice to improve the identification and management of psychological problems and needs in patients with SpA and IBD.

Implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease / Implementación de las recomendaciones para el manejo psicológico de pacientes con espondiloartritis y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Objective: To assess and improve the level of implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Qualitative study. We performed a narrative literature review to identify the recommendations for the psychological management of SpA and associated IBD and to explore their level of implementation. Based on the findings, we developed a national survey to assess: (1) current level of knowledge and implementation of the recommendations; (2) attitudes towards the recommendations; and (3) barriers and facilitators to their implementation. The results of the review and survey were discussed by a multidisciplinary group of 9 expert rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, who defined implementation strategies to increase the uptake of the recommendations. Results: The review included 4 articles, 2 of them included direct recommendations on the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with SpA and IBD. None assessed the level of implementation of the recommendations in routine clinical practice. Our survey showed a great lack of awareness and implementation of the recommendations, even though psychological issues are very relevant for health professionals. Lack of time, resources, and knowledge are considered the main barriers to adherence to the recommendations. We propose several implementation strategies related to educational activities, clinical practice, and others to increase the uptake of reported recommendations. Conclusions: Further research and efforts are required to achieve behaviour changes in clinical practice to improve the identification and management of psychological problems and needs in patients with SpA and IBD. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar y mejorar la implementación de las recomendaciones sobre la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de pacientes con espondiloartritis (EspA) y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) asociada. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura para identificar las recomendaciones sobre el manejo psicológico de pacientes con EspA y EII asociada y explorar su grado de implementación. En base a ello se diseñó una encuesta para analizar el nivel de conocimiento de las recomendaciones, las barreras y los facilitadores a su implementación. Todos los resultados fueron discutidos por un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos reumatólogos y gastroenterólogos que definieron estrategias para incrementar el seguimiento de las recomendaciones. Resultados: La revisión incluyó 4 artículos, de los que 2 aportan recomendaciones directas sobre la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de pacientes con EspA y EII. Ninguno ha evaluado el grado de implementación de las recomendaciones en la práctica diaria. La encuesta mostró que el conocimiento de las mismas y la implementación de estas recomendaciones son prácticamente nulos a pesar de ser un tema muy relevante para los profesionales que manejan estos pacientes. La falta de tiempo, la escasez de recursos y la falta de reconocimiento se consideran las principales barreras para la correcta identificación y manejo de los aspectos psicológicos en pacientes con EspA y EII. Se proponen una serie de actividades formativas y relacionadas con la práctica clínica para mejorar esta situación. Conclusiones: Se precisa seguir trabajando en la implementación para conseguir cambios en la práctica diaria para mejorar la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de los pacientes con EspA y EII. (AU)

Identification of the first signs or symptoms in different spondyloarthritis subtypes and their association with HLA-B27: data from REGISPONSER and RESPONDIA registries.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyse the initial symptoms attributable to patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and their association with HLA-B27 status. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional and multicentre study with patients who fulfilled the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria for SpA from the Registry of Spondyloarthritis of Spanish Rheumatology (REGISPONSER) and Ibero-American Registry of Spondyloarthropathies (RESPONDIA) united registries. Differences in the first sign(s) or symptom(s) were compared across diagnoses and between HLA-B27 status. The diagnostic delay between patients who start the disease with musculoskeletal manifestations (MMs) and extra-MMs (EMMs) was compared. RESULTS: A total of 4067 patients were included (2208 from REGISPONSER and 1859 from RESPONDIA) (ankylosing spondylitis (AS): 68.3%, psoriatic arthritis (PsA): 19.9%, undifferentiated SpA: 11.8%). Overall, 3624 (89.1%) patients initiated the disease with MMs and 443 (10.9%) with EMMs. Low back pain (61.7%) and lower-limb arthritis (38.5%) were the most frequent initial symptoms. In AS patients, the absence of HLA-B27 seems to be related to an increase in the probability of starting the disease with cervical pain and peripheral manifestations. In PsA, the onset of arthritis and psoriasis was more prevalent in HLA-B27-negative patients, while initiation with axial manifestations was more predominant in HLA-B27-positive patients. The diagnostic delay was longer in patients with initial MMs than in those with EMMs (7.2 (34.8) vs 4.5 (7.6) years, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this SpA population, MMs were the most prevalent initial symptoms, with differences across diagnoses and depending on the presence of the HLA-B27 antigen.

The paradigm of IL-23-independent production of IL-17F and IL-17A and their role in chronic inflammatory diseases.

Interleukin-17 family (IL-17s) comprises six structurally related members (IL-17A to IL-17F); sequence homology is highest between IL-17A and IL-17F, displaying certain overlapping functions. In general, IL-17A and IL-17F play important roles in chronic inflammation and autoimmunity, controlling bacterial and fungal infections, and signaling mainly through activation of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. The role of IL-17A and IL-17F has been established in chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and asthma. CD4+ helper T cells (Th17) activated by IL-23 are well-studied sources of IL-17A and IL-17F. However, other cellular subtypes can also produce IL-17A and IL-17F, including gamma delta (γδ) T cells, alpha beta (αß) T cells, type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3), natural killer T cells (NKT), or mucosal associated invariant T cells (MAIT). Interestingly, the production of IL-17A and IL-17F by innate and innate-like lymphocytes can take place in an IL-23 independent manner in addition to IL-23 classical pathway. This would explain the limitations of the inhibition of IL-23 in the treatment of patients with certain rheumatic immune-mediated conditions such as axSpA. Despite their coincident functions, IL-17A and IL-17F contribute independently to chronic tissue inflammation having somehow non-redundant roles. Although IL-17A has been more widely studied, both IL-17A and IL-17F are overexpressed in PsO, PsA, axSpA and HS. Therefore, dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F could provide better outcomes than IL-23 or IL-17A blockade.

Disease control in patients with psoriatic arthritis in real clinical practice in Spain: MiDAS study.

OBJECTIVE: MiDAS study assessed the percentage of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients treated in routine clinical practice who achieved control of disease activity according to Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA). METHODS: Observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted under conditions of routine clinical practice in 36 centers with outpatient rheumatology clinics in Spanish public hospitals. Patients included were adults (≥18 years) with ≥6 months PsA diagnosis according to classification for PsA (CASPAR) criteria and undergoing treatment ≥3 months. The main variable evaluated was the percentage of patients under remission and low disease activity, assessed through DAPSA and MDA. RESULTS: 313 patients with PsA were included: 54.3% male; with mean age of 54.1±12.2 years and mean disease duration of 10.5±9.0 years. Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels were 4.9±7.3mg/L. At the study visit, 58.5% of patients were in monotherapy (17.6% biological and 40.9% non-biological) and 41.2% were receiving biological and non-biological therapy. 59.4% of patients showed low disease activity (DAPSA≤14) and 19.8% were on remission (DAPSA≤4). Moreover, 51.4% of the patients reached an MDA status (≥5 MDA). CONCLUSIONS: Around 40% of PsA patients presented uncontrolled disease, highlighting the need to improve the management of these patients in clinical practice.

Validation of N Protein Antibodies to Diagnose Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Large Cohort of Healthcare Workers: Use of Roche Elecsys® Immunoassay in the S Protein Vaccination Era.

The aim of this study was to validate the detection of anti-nucleocapsid protein (N protein) antibodies for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in light of the fact that most COVID-19 vaccines use the spike (S) protein as the antigen. Here, 3550 healthcare workers (HCWs) were enrolled from May 2020 (when no S protein vaccines were available). We defined SARS-CoV-2 infection if HCWs were found to be positive by RT-PCR or found to be positive in at least two different serological immunoassays. Serum samples from Biobanc I3PT-CERCA were analyzed by Roche Elecsys® (N protein) and Vircell IgG (N and S proteins) immunoassays. Discordant samples were reanalyzed with other commercial immunoassays. Roche Elecsys® showed the positivity of 539 (15.2%) HCWs, 664 (18.7%) were found to be positive by Vircell IgG immunoassays, and 164 samples (4.6%) showed discrepant results. According to our SARS-CoV-2 infection criteria, 563 HCWs had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Roche Elecsys® immunoassay has a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and concordance with the presence of infection of 94.7%, 99.8%, 99.3%, and 0.96, respectively. Similar results were observed in a validation cohort of vaccinated HCWs. We conclude that the Roche Elecsys® SARS-CoV-2 N protein immunoassay demonstrated good performance in diagnosing previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of HCWs.

Disease control in patients with psoriatic arthritis in real clinical practice in Spain: MiDAS study / Control de la enfermedad en pacientes con artritis psoriásica en práctica clínica real en España: estudio MiDAS

Objective: MiDAS study assessed the percentage of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients treated in routine clinical practice who achieved control of disease activity according to Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA). Methods: Observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted under conditions of routine clinical practice in 36 centers with outpatient rheumatology clinics in Spanish public hospitals. Patients included were adults (≥18 years) with ≥6 months PsA diagnosis according to classification for PsA (CASPAR) criteria and undergoing treatment ≥3 months. The main variable evaluated was the percentage of patients under remission and low disease activity, assessed through DAPSA and MDA. Results: 313 patients with PsA were included: 54.3% male; with mean age of 54.1±12.2 years and mean disease duration of 10.5±9.0 years. Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels were 4.9±7.3mg/L. At the study visit, 58.5% of patients were in monotherapy (17.6% biological and 40.9% non-biological) and 41.2% were receiving biological and non-biological therapy. 59.4% of patients showed low disease activity (DAPSA≤14) and 19.8% were on remission (DAPSA≤4). Moreover, 51.4% of the patients reached an MDA status (≥5 MDA). Conclusions: Around 40% of PsA patients presented uncontrolled disease, highlighting the need to improve the management of these patients in clinical practice.(AU)

Objetivo: El estudio MiDAS evaluó el porcentaje de pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) tratados en práctica clínica habitual que lograron el control de la actividad de la enfermedad de acuerdo con Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) y Minimal Disease Activity (MDA). Métodos: Estudio observacional, no intervencionista, transversal, multicéntrico, realizado en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual en 36 centros con consultas externas de reumatología de hospitales públicos españoles. Los pacientes incluidos eran adultos (≥18 años) con ≥6 meses de diagnóstico de APs según los criterios de clasificación de la APs (CASPAR) y en tratamiento durante ≥3 meses. La variable principal evaluada fue el porcentaje de pacientes en remisión y baja actividad de la enfermedad, evaluados mediante DAPSA y MDA. Resultados: Se incluyeron 313 pacientes con APs: 54,3% varones; con una edad media de 54,1±12,2 años y una duración media de la enfermedad de 10,5±9,0 años. Los niveles séricos medios de proteína C reactiva fueron de 4,9±7,3mg/L. En la visita del estudio, el 58,5% de los pacientes estaban siendo tratados con monoterapia (17,6% biológicos y 40,9% no biológicos) y el 41,2% recibían terapia biológica y no biológica. El 59,4% de los pacientes mostró baja actividad de la enfermedad (DAPSA≤14) y el 19,8% estaban en remisión (DAPSA≤4). Además, el 51,4% de los pacientes alcanzó un estado de MDA (≥5 MDA). Conclusiones: Alrededor del 40% de los pacientes con APs presentaban enfermedad no controlada, destacando la necesidad de mejorar el manejo de estos pacientes en la práctica clínica.(AU)

Metabolic and inflammatory profiles define phenotypes with clinical relevance in female knee osteoarthritis patients with joint effusion.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis has been the subject of abundant research in the last years with limited translation to the clinical practice, probably due to the disease's high heterogeneity. In this study, we aimed to identify different phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with joint effusion based on their metabolic and inflammatory profiles. METHODS: A non-supervised strategy based on statistical and machine learning methods was applied to 45 parameters measured on 168 female KOA patients with persistent joint effusion, consecutively recruited at our hospital after a monographic OA outpatient visit. Data comprised anthropometric and metabolic factors and a panel of systemic and local inflammatory markers. The resulting clusters were compared regarding their clinical, radiographic and ultrasound severity at baseline and their radiographic progression at two years. RESULTS: Our analyses identified four KOA inflammatory phenotypes (KOIP): a group characterized by metabolic syndrome, probably driven by body fat and obesity, and by high local and systemic inflammation (KOIP-1); a metabolically healthy phenotype with mild overall inflammation (KOIP-2); a non-metabolic phenotype with high inflammation levels (KOIP-3); and a metabolic phenotype with low inflammation and cardiovascular risk factors not associated with obesity (KOIP-4). Of interest, these groups exhibited differences regarding pain, functional disability and radiographic progression, pointing to a clinical relevance of the uncovered phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Our results support the existence of different KOA phenotypes with clinical relevance and differing pathways regarding their pathophysiology and disease evolution, which entails implications in patients' stratification, treatment tailoring and the search of novel and personalized therapies.

Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis are Great Consumers of Healthcare Resources, Especially Young and Women: Results from the Spanish Atlas.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess high healthcare utilization over 1 year in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and factors associated with increased healthcare utilization. METHODS: A total of 530 unselected patients with axSpA from the Atlas of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Spain-who had used at least one healthcare resource-were included in the present study. Total health care utilization was obtained from the total number of healthcare visits, medical tests, hospital admissions and emergency visits, during the 12 months prior to the survey. Linear regression was used to analyse possible factors associated with higher healthcare utilization. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients with axSpA participated in this study: mean age was 45.3 years and 51.1% were female. In the previous 12 months, 77.9% (n = 530) used at least one healthcare resource, with the median healthcare utilization at 25. In the multiple linear regression, the only categorical factor associated with higher healthcare utilization was female gender (ß = 12.854), while the continuous factors associated with higher healthcare utilization were higher disease activity (ß = 3.378), longer diagnostic delay (ß = 0.959), younger age (ß = - 0.737) and greater functional limitation (ß = 0.576). CONCLUSION: Half of patients with axSpA used 25 or more healthcare resources during 1 year. Higher healthcare utilization was associated with younger age, female gender, greater disease activity, higher functional limitation and longer diagnostic delay. Optimal monitoring of patients with axSpA may help to reduce their healthcare utilization.

Recursos y estrategias para optimizar el manejo de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica: proyecto CREA / Strategies and resources to optimise the management of Psoriatic Arthritis patients: the CREA Project

Antecedentes y objetivo: La artritis psoriásica (APs) es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica mediada por el sistema inmune que afecta al sistema musculoesquelético y la piel, y se manifiesta de forma heterogénea y con un curso variable. En la práctica clínica habitual se ha observado variabilidad y limitaciones en su seguimiento. El objetivo del proyecto CREA fue consensuar estrategias de mejora para la valoración inicial y el seguimiento de los pacientes con APs en España. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta a una muestra representativa de reumatólogos expertos del territorio español, que contenía 33 preguntas sobre la práctica clínica habitual, los recursos disponibles y las limitaciones actuales en el seguimiento de los pacientes con APs. Se discutieron los resultados en reuniones regionales y se propusieron 105 estrategias que, finalmente, fueron valoradas por 85 expertos en un consenso Delphi. Resultados: Las limitaciones destacadas en el seguimiento de la APs fueron la falta de tiempo en consulta, de personal de enfermería, y el retraso en la realización de pruebas de imagen. Se propusieron 108 estrategias relacionadas con la evaluación de los índices de calidad de vida e impacto de la enfermedad; las comorbilidades y las manifestaciones extraarticulares; las pruebas de laboratorio; las pruebas de imagen; la exploración física y metrología y los índices de actividad y función. Entre todas, 53 se consideraron altamente aconsejables, sin diferencias regionales en los valores de consenso. Discusión y conclusiones: Las propuestas ofrecidas en el estudio actual son aplicables a todo el territorio nacional, responden a las necesidades no cubiertas detectadas en la encuesta inicial, conforman un cuadro de actuación mínimo y aseguran un seguimiento óptimo de los pacientes con APs.(AU)

Background and aim: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease that affects the musculoskeletal system and skin, and manifests heterogeneously, with a variable course. In current clinical practice, variability and limitations in its follow-up have been observed. The aim of the CREA project was to agree on strategies to improve the initial assessment and follow-up of patients with PsA in Spain. Materials and methods: A survey was conducted among a representative sample of expert rheumatologists in Spain, containing 33 questions on current clinical practice, available resources, and current limitations in the follow-up of patients with PsA. The results were discussed in regional meetings and 105 strategies were proposed and finally evaluated by 85 experts in a Delphi consensus. Results: The most important limitations in the follow-up of PsA were lack of consultation time, lack of nursing staff, and delays in performing imaging tests. A total of 108 strategies were proposed related to the assessment of quality of life and disease-impact indices; comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations; laboratory tests; imaging tests; physical examination and metrology; and activity and function indices. Of the total, 53 were considered highly advisable, with no regional differences in consensus values. Discussion and conclusions: The proposals offered in the current study are applicable to the entire country, respond to the unmet needs detected in the initial survey, form a minimum action framework, and ensure optimal follow-up of patients with PsA.(AU)

Disease control in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in real clinical practice in Spain: Results of the MIDAS study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Understanding the disease activity is fundamental to improve patient prognosis and patients' quality of life. MiDAS study described disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) Spanish patients and the proportion of them with controlled disease. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study carried out under conditions of routine clinical practice. Adult (≥18 years) patients with ≥6 months since AS diagnosis treated ≥3 months prior to inclusion. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with low disease activity assessed through BASDAI (primary endpoint) and ASDAS-CRP (secondary endpoint). RESULTS: 313 AS patients included: 75.7% male; 78.5% HLA-B*27 positive; mean (SD) baseline age of 50.4 (12.0) years; mean (SD) disease duration of 15.5 (11.6) years; 73.5% were treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 22.4% with non-biological DMARDs and 53.7% with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or in combination. Monotherapy with biologics and non-biologics was used by 29.7% and 26.8% of patients, respectively. According to BASDAI, 38.0% were in remission (BASDAI≤2) and 64.5% showed adequate disease control (BASDAI<4). According to ASDAS-CRP, 29.4% achieved remission (ASDAS-CRP<1.3) and 28.1% low disease activity (1.3≤ASDAS-CRP<2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Almost two thirds of the AS patients recruited had low disease activity, with about one third of them being in remission (BASDAI≤2, ASDAS-CRP<1.3). These results highlight the existing room for improvement in treating AS patients in clinical practice.

Recursos y estrategias para la óptima atención de los pacientes con espondiloartritis axial: Proyecto CREA / Resources and Strategies for the Optimal Care of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: The CREA Project

Antecedentes y objetivo: La espondiloartritis axial (EspAax) es una enfermedad musculoesquelética con manifestaciones diversas. En la práctica clínica se ha observado variabilidad y limitaciones en la recogida de las variables necesarias para su seguimiento. El objetivo del proyecto CREA fue consensuar estrategias de mejora para la valoración inicial y el seguimiento de los pacientes con EspAax en España. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta con 33 preguntas a una muestra representativa de reumatólogos expertos del territorio español sobre la práctica clínica, los recursos y las limitaciones actuales en el seguimiento de los pacientes con EspAax. En 10 reuniones regionales se discutieron los resultados de la encuesta y se propusieron 107 estrategias que fueron valoradas mediante un consenso Delphi en el que participaron 85 expertos. Resultados: La falta de tiempo en consulta, de personal de enfermería y/o de apoyo, y el retraso en la realización de pruebas de imagen fueron las limitaciones más destacadas en el seguimiento de los pacientes con EspAax. Se propusieron 202 estrategias relacionadas con la evaluación de los índices de calidad de vida e impacto de la enfermedad; las comorbilidades y manifestaciones extraarticulares; las pruebas de laboratorio; las pruebas de imagen; la exploración física y metrología; y los índices de actividad y función. De todas, 54 se consideraron altamente aconsejables. No se encontraron diferencias regionales en los valores de consenso. Conclusiones: Las propuestas consensuadas como altamente aconsejables en el estudio actual son aplicables a todo el territorio nacional, permiten realizar un seguimiento y control más estrecho y homogéneo de los pacientes con EspAax, facilitar un manejo integral y responden a las necesidades no cubiertas detectadas en la encuesta inicial.(AU)

Background and objective: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are musculoskeletal diseases with different manifestations. In clinical practice, variability, and limitations in the collection of the outcomes required for follow-up have been observed. The objective of the CREA project was to agree on improvement strategies for the initial assessment and follow-up of patients with axSpA in Spain. Materials and methods: A survey with 33 questions was conducted by a representative sample of rheumatologists on clinical practice, resources, and present limitations in the follow-up of patients with axSpA. The results of the survey were discussed in 10 regional meetings, and 105 strategies were proposed and evaluated through a Delphi consensus in which 85 experts participated. Results: The lack of time for clinical visits, the lack of nurses and/or support staff and the delay in performing the imaging tests were the most prominent limitations in the follow-up of patients with axSpA. One hundred and five strategies were proposed related to the evaluation of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and disease impact, to the evaluation of comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations, laboratory tests; imaging tests, physical examination and metrology. Of the total, 85 were considered highly advisable. No regional differences were found. Conclusions: The proposals agreed upon as highly advisable in the present study are applicable to the entire national territory, allow tighter and more homogeneous monitoring of the patients with axSpA, facilitate more comprehensive management of the disease, and respond to the unmet needs detected in the initial survey.(AU)

Disease control in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in real clinical practice in Spain: Results of the MIDAS study / Control de la enfermedad en pacientes con espondilitis anquilosante en la práctica clínica habitual en España: Resultados del estudio MiDAS

Introduction and objectives: Understanding the disease activity is fundamental to improve patient prognosis and patients’ quality of life. MiDAS study described disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) Spanish patients and the proportion of them with controlled disease. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study carried out under conditions of routine clinical practice. Adult (≥18 years) patients with ≥6 months since AS diagnosis treated ≥3 months prior to inclusion. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with low disease activity assessed through BASDAI (primary endpoint) and ASDAS-CRP (secondary endpoint). Results: 313 AS patients included: 75.7% male; 78.5% HLA-B*27 positive; mean (SD) baseline age of 50.4 (12.0) years; mean (SD) disease duration of 15.5 (11.6) years; 73.5% were treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 22.4% with non-biological DMARDs and 53.7% with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or in combination. Monotherapy with biologics and non-biologics was used by 29.7% and 26.8% of patients, respectively. According to BASDAI, 38.0% were in remission (BASDAI≤2) and 64.5% showed adequate disease control (BASDAI<4). According to ASDAS-CRP, 29.4% achieved remission (ASDAS-CRP<1.3) and 28.1% low disease activity (1.3≤ASDAS-CRP<2.1). Conclusions: Almost two thirds of the AS patients recruited had low disease activity, with about one third of them being in remission (BASDAI≤2, ASDAS-CRP<1.3). These results highlight the existing room for improvement in treating AS patients in clinical practice.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: Comprender la actividad de la enfermedad es fundamental para mejorar el pronóstico y la calidad de vida de los pacientes. El estudio MiDAS describió la actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes españoles con espondilitis anquilosante (EA) y la proporción de ellos con enfermedad controlada. Métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico, realizado en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes adultos (≥18años) con ≥6meses desde el diagnóstico de EA tratados ≥3meses antes de la inclusión. La variable principal fue el porcentaje de pacientes en baja actividad, evaluado mediante BASDAI (variable principal) y ASDAS-CRP (variable secundaria). Resultados: Hubo 313 pacientes con EA incluidos: 75,7% varones; 78,5% HLA-B*27 positivos; edad media (DE) basal de 50,4 (12,0) años; duración media (DE) de la enfermedad de 15,5 (11,6) años; el 73,5% fueron tratados con fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) biológicos, el 22,4% con FAME no biológicos y el 53,7% con antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, solos o en combinación. La monoterapia con biológicos y no biológicos fue utilizada por el 29,7 y el 26,8% de los pacientes, respectivamente. Según BASDAI, el 38,0% estaban en remisión (BASDAI≤2) y el 64,5% mostraron un adecuado control de la enfermedad (BASDAI<4). Según ASDAS-CRP, el 29,4% alcanzaron remisión (ASDAS-CRP<1,3) y el 28,1% baja actividad de la enfermedad (1,3≤ASDAS-CRP<2,1). Conclusiones: Casi dos tercios de los pacientes con EA incluidos presentaban baja actividad de la enfermedad, con aproximadamente un tercio de ellos en remisión (BASDAI≤2, ASDAS-CRP<1,3). Estos resultados destacan el margen de mejora existente para tratar pacientes con EA en la práctica clínica.(AU)

Recomendaciones de expertos para el uso de apremilast en artritis psoriásica / Expert recommendations for the use of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis

Introducción y objetivos: A pesar de la evidencia, existen dudas sobre el posicionamiento de apremilast en el algoritmo de tratamiento de la artritis psoriásica (APs). El objetivo del presente proyecto fue recoger la evidencia científica y la experiencia de un grupo de reumatólogos expertos en el manejo de la APs sobre el uso de apremilast en la práctica clínica en España. Material y métodos: Un comité científico formado por 6 expertos propuso 5 escenarios clínicos donde la evidencia sobre el uso de apremilast en APs era controvertida: 1) eficacia en APs periférica; 2) eficacia en entesitis y dactilitis; 3) eficacia en APs con afectación cutánea; 4) comorbilidades, y 5) seguridad de apremilast. Tras esto, un panel de 17 reumatólogos expertos en el tratamiento de la APs discutió estos escenarios y generó un cuestionario con 50 preguntas y 156 ítems según metodología Delphi, el cual fue respondido de forma anónima por los panelistas. Resultados: Tras 2 rondas de votación, el panel de expertos alcanzó el consenso en 93 de los 156 ítems planteados (59,6%) (67 apropiados y 26 inapropiados). El grado de consenso fue del 53,3% en el área de «Eficacia en APs periférica»; del 60,0% en «Eficacia en entesitis y dactilitis»; del 50,0% en «Eficacia en APs con afectación cutánea»; del 57,1% en «Manejo de las comorbilidades en pacientes con APs», y del 67,3% en «Implicaciones de la seguridad en el uso de apremilast». Conclusiones: La opinión estructurada de los expertos complementa la evidencia disponible y contribuye al establecimiento de pautas consensuadas para el uso de apremilast en APs.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Despite the evidence, there are doubts about the positioning of apremilast in the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment algorithm. The objective of this project was to collect the scientific evidence and the experience of a group of rheumatologists who are experts in the management of PsA with apremilast in clinical practice in Spain. Material and methods: A scientific committee made up of 6 experts proposed 5 clinical scenarios where the evidence on the use of apremilast in PsA was controversial: 1) efficacy in peripheral PsA; 2) efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis; 3) efficacy in PsA with skin involvement; 4) comorbidities, and 5) apremilast safety. After this, a panel of 17 rheumatologists with expertise in PsA management discussed these scenarios and generated a questionnaire with 50 questions and 156 items following the Delphi methodology. This questionnaire was anonymously answered by the panel. Results: After 2 voting rounds, the panel of experts reached consensus in 93 of the 156 items raised (59.6%) (67 appropiate and 26 inappropiate). The degree of consensus was 53.3% in the area of “Efficacy in peripheral PsA”; 60.0% in “Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis”; 50.0% in “Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement”; 57.1% in “Management of comorbidities in patients with PsA”, and 67.3% in “Implications of safety in the use of apremilast”. Conclusions: The structured opinion of the experts complements the available evidence and contributes to the establishment of consensual guidelines for the use of apremilast in PsA.(AU)

Expert recommendations for the use of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the evidence, there are doubts about the positioning of apremilast in the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment algorithm. The objective of this project was to collect the scientific evidence and the experience of a group of rheumatologists who are experts in the management of PsA with apremilast in clinical practice in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scientific committee made up of 6 experts proposed 5 clinical scenarios where the evidence on the use of apremilast in PsA was controversial: (i) Efficacy in peripheral PsA; (ii) Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis; (iii) Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement; (iv) Comorbidities; and (v) Apremilast safety. After this, a panel of 17 rheumatologists with expertise in PsA management discussed these scenarios and generated a questionnaire with 50 questions and 156 items following the Delphi methodology. This questionnaire was anonymously answered by the panel. RESULTS: After 2 voting rounds, the panel of experts reached consensus in 93 of the 156 items raised (59.6%) (67 in agreement and 26 in disagreement). The degree of consensus was 53.3% in the area of "Efficacy in peripheral PsA"; 60.0% in "Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis"; 50.0% in "Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement"; 57.1% in "Management of comorbidities in patients with PsA"; and 67.3% in "Implications of safety in the use of apremilast". CONCLUSIONS: The structured opinion of the experts complements the available evidence and contributes to the establishment of consensual guidelines for the use of apremilast in PsA.

Resources and strategies for the optimal care of patients with axial spondyloarthritis: The CREA project.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are musculoskeletal diseases with different manifestations. In clinical practice, variability, and limitations in the collection of the outcomes required for follow-up have been observed. The objective of the CREA project was to agree on improvement strategies for the initial assessment and follow-up of patients with axSpA in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey with 33 questions was conducted by a representative sample of rheumatologists on clinical practice, resources, and present limitations in the follow-up of patients with axSpA. The results of the survey were discussed in 10 regional meetings, and 105 strategies were proposed and evaluated through a Delphi consensus in which 85 experts participated. RESULTS: The lack of time for clinical visits, the lack of nurses and/or support staff and the delay in performing the imaging tests were the most prominent limitations in the follow-up of patients with axSpA. One hundred and five strategies were proposed related to the evaluation of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and disease impact, to the evaluation of comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations, laboratory tests; imaging tests, physical examination and metrology. Of the total, 85 were considered highly advisable. No regional differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The proposals agreed upon as highly advisable in the present study are applicable to the entire national territory, allow tighter and more homogeneous monitoring of the patients with axSpA, facilitate more comprehensive management of the disease, and respond to the unmet needs detected in the initial survey.